OJROMANCE None of the reviews are "negative" - there certainly are criticisms, but they mostly sound positive.
(1) The background is good And it's not pretty bad after reading 1-20 chapters. (3.5 stars)
(2) But the idea of the story is good and I hope is will be better in the future chapters! (3.5 stars)
(3) surely if u r looking for a fun read i think its a good one. The author did a good jod with character development except for the FL, the writing style is straight forward n the story has a good flow to it. And to conclude i really appreciate the FL best friend she is a sensible character. And every story has its charm n according to me the charm in this story r the background characters. (4.5 stars)
(4) This is one of my favorite written story.I love historical romance and the choice of characters are great! (4.5 stars)
Not even going to mention the troll review, which neither criticizes nor compliments, but gives you a 3 star (I wonder if you'll delete it if it was a 1 star review).
Either you have no idea what a "negative" review is, or you're just shooting yourself in the foot. I honestly don't know what Gem4Life wrote, so I'm going to be neutral here and reserve judgement until I actually see her review for myself, but honestly, you're not going to convince anyone. How are 4.5 star reviews even remotely considered "negative"?
Furthermore, you literally wrote at Chapter 10 "Warning: Detailed mature scene" and you had quite the explicit foreplay (and no matter how I read it, it seemed forced onto poor Nana, who didn't give consent, so it's pretty much sexual assault), so it's pretty dishonest of you to attack Gem4Life and accuse her of being a liar while not admitting that you did have the Emperor sexually assault Nana (and no, just because there was no penetration with his...uh...d, doesn't mean it's not sexual assault - and he used his fingers - sorry, everyone, if I gave too much info). Even if you claim that it's not sexual assault, it's still a pretty explicit scene that involves fingering and undressing, but why did you not clarify that? I don't think you're in any position to accuse people of lying.
You need to be less biased and not pretend that high-rating reviews that positively compliment you are "negative" reviews. An example of a negative review is (2) but without the "But the idea of the story is good" and a complete lack of encouragement. Hell, the reviewer even gave you 3.5 stars, which is a decent score - a negative review would be 1 or 2 stars. Correct me if I'm wrong, but I have not seen a single 1 or 2 star review in your story at all. There is nothing lower than 3 stars and that belongs to that troll review that didn't even make a single negative remark, so I'm not sure if that can even count as "negative."