- Edited
Leylin_Farlier Hmm, choosing the more cruel option doesn't always make one evil tho. For example, the protagonist of Everybody Loves Large Chests is way more cruel than Leylin, but i would say 'it' is more in the lines of chaotic allignment. It may destroy towns, cause the death of thousands or eat whole villages, tho that still doesn't really make it evil...
On the topic of Leylin, he wouldn't snatch an icecream if he can afford to buy it even if it meant equal or better outcome. He doesn't really do petty stuff. Petty stuff i'm talking about means that if Leylin can afford something, he doesn't go out of his way to snatch it even if it is something valuable to others. Also, what is 'truly innocent'? Just holding onto something might make you guilty, just like how you would be guilty if you were to hold onto, transport or sell jade as a commoner in ancient china. All jade belongs to the emperor, commoners aren't allowed, your head would fly for that offense! Innocence is just a matter of perspective. If i say you are innocent, then you are innocent, but if i say you are guilty because of holding that icecream, then you are guilty. So doesn't that mean Leylin is completely just in his actions?