Happy_AltRight This statement seems to be making a lot of assumptions about the motivations of both kings and authors of harem stories. The idea that a king would choose to lead wars solely for the purpose of bedding women every day is a gross oversimplification of the complex factors that go into decisions about war and leadership. Additionally, the statement about harem authors lacking motivations and living off validation from readers is a baseless generalization. I really do not understand what you are getting at here.
IT'S A SERIOUS PROBLEM WITH AUTHORS .. WHY ALWAYS HAREM ?
Already_In_Use Writing a harem story solely for the sake of "fun" and "horny stuff" does not necessarily make for a well-crafted and meaningful narrative. Additionally, the statement seems to suggest that writing sex scenes is a core part of storytelling, which is not true for all genres and forms of literature.
Furthermore, the assertion that well-written harems are underrepresented could be challenged. There are plenty of quality stories that do not rely on harems or sexual content to engage readers. The idea that a certain type of story is inherently more difficult to write well is also debatable, as every story has its own challenges and requirements for success.