- Edited
Clowniac Ok, let me bow down first. m(._.)m
And nah... I didn't see you as an asshole, just a condescending and slightly bitter person? I mean, I almost compared you to a Mr./Ms. thundercloud, who didn't get to eat his/her bowl of sunshine this morning.
StenDuring The OP offered this suggestion from a reader's perspective, though. Not from an author's view that would like WN to help them write their stories better. I'm also a reader, and it's true what Clowniac previously said, on point #4 of his previous post, that I'm the kind of reader who is willing to disregard glaring errors as long as I like the story's plot and characters. But it doesn't mean I don't want better value for my money. And if this kind of integration would give us that good ol' bit quality assurance, then why not? And please, by all means, stay with your word processor, you're probably one of those authors who, like Clowniac, don't need help with your grammar anyway.
And honestly, I still don't understand why was there a need to shoot down this suggestion just like that?
"No! No need for Grammarly integration!"
"No! It's the authors' responsibilities! Those who don't provide good quality work are just lazy authors!"
Fine, chide those authors as much as you want for being lazy, but as a reader, what's my option, then? Just suck it up or leave the app?
My point is, please don't shoot down suggestions like this, just because you all think you know better. Don't be a little ray of pitch black. And whether or not this suggestion would be accepted or not, it's not up to me, to you, or the OP, hence it's a suggestion. In the end, it's up to WN whether or not they're going to implement it.