Authors deleting reviews
- Edited
Lilliny such a fool and a liar, you deleted it cause the shit in there where too much. There's no way the author will delete a review which is clearly defending her and anyone buying your shit has the same shit head that you have. You all be here talking shits about another persons book, men. Take heart because you niggas need help
- Edited
Any nigga talking rubbish about this author book needs help! And you gren ..whatever you name is, go leave another review on his book and I bet you that you'll not only regret writing it but also regret the day you were born. You and that stupid boy Lilley whatever. You want to write another review, go and do it but I know you can't because you're scared, you claim he deletes his reviews but you deleted the one you wrote when his fans tried to correct you. I wise they'd see this post. You're so childish and stupid.
Last I checked a review represents the view of the reviewer, and it pertains to the written works, not the author. What bloody moron expects the reviewer to actively start defending an author?
Go home, look up the word 'review' in a thesarius and apply that new knowledge. If you don't understand the word thesarius there are probably kind people on this thread more than willing to explain in terms of words with two wovels or less.
- Edited
StenDuring Go home look the word review and you ain't gonna see where they say: I bet the author doesn't have any sexual experience or had a bad sexual experience.
Now I'm gonna explain to you what reviews are for. They're where you complain that something don't work, where you leave meaningful complain that isn't up to your satisfaction and that others doesn't know about. Reviews section isn't a place where you rant that a book is stupid just because you mistakenly came across a genre that isn't what you like. I know this author and he'll tell you repeatedly that her book need editing, not that it truly needs it. Don't complain about the plot, author's ain't gonna rewrite there book just cause you don't like it. Every story is unique in there own way.
Complain about the grammar, about the mistake but only argue the plot with the characters and if a book is rapey or incest which ain't what you like, dude leave there. Their are niggas who like that type of shit. All you niggas are misinterpreting the word review. Don't go to a book which the title clearly stated that there will be lots of killing and then go to the review section to write: "stupid author, all the ML knows about is kill innocent people." very funny how you niggas with low mentality be thinking sometimes.
[unknown] You're so childish and stupid.
The irony in this statement is just...wow.
Just so you know, I read OJROMANCE's book and I didn't write a review, nor did I "shittalk" it, so before you jump in and start insulting me for being stupid and insulting other people, make sure you're not just lashing out at everyone who merely disagrees with you.
before_after lol from your words,I feel like author didn't say he'll get his powers in first thirty chapters and work for his revenge. Maybe he wanted to grow the characters before doing it
While I agree with you that a reviewer had better stay away from a disliked genre I'll clearly state that you're plain wrong as far as the other subtopics go.
Given that I'm able to (in my role as a reviewer) present a succint, albeit subjective, opinion about a given work a review will contain at least the following:
1) character depiction
2) narrative
3) adherence to genre
4) good and bad points of the story within the scope of the genre for its supposed demography
Observe that the language used normally isn't part of a review, unless we're talking literary fiction, since mastery of the language ususally is taken for granted. Poor spelling, grammar and sentence structure is basically something new that came along with webpublications. Basically those stories would never pass through the very first filter in traditional publishing.
I did write that a review is subjective. It not only has to be, but it is supposed to be as well. A review is the reviewer's personal opinion about a work, backed up by more or less valid credentials as a reviewer. In the world of reviews some people have a better, or rather more powerful, reputation compared to others. In that sense it's the same as for authors.
For that very reason a reviewer will seldom make it known that they know the author. That kind of relationship undermines the validity of a review, in as much as a review could ever be valid to begin with.
Now, as for opinions about content, making it clear that a story is disturbing due to being "rapey or incest" is perfectly valid. A review is primarily written for other potential readers. It's reader faced, not author faced, and its function therefore is to give a new reader an idea about what is to be expected. If a story carry a set of human values which go contrary to the norm you'd expect to find that pointed out. This would be true no matter if the values presented are worse or better than the norm. Since there's a difference from some kind of standard values the reviewer will implicitly clearly make his/her views of that standard known.
Even if a story makes it abundantly clear that there will be a huge body count concerning innocent people a review that voices an opinion about the depiction of those killings is clearly doing its job. A reviewer stating that a work is a disturbing piece of disgusting crap because it glorifies the raping of recently killed humans is perfectly valid. Reading the review I get an understanding that the reviewer firmly believes there's no excuse for presenting said violations in a rose tinted light. I may or may nor agree with the reviewer (well I personally would agree) and either pick up or not pick up the story based on that review.
The main mistake with the rant I'm currently replying to is that it carries the notion that a reviewer owes the author anything. Nothing could be further from the truth. The reviewer, if owing anyone anything at all, writes for the readers -- the reviewer being one him/herself. As a reviewer I should avoid the idea that an author is some kind of special snowflake and focus on what I believe are the credits or demerits of a story. Nothing else.
- Edited
Tomoyuki I ain't gonna lash out at you cause you did nothing but I'm gonna defend my post you replied to. It's mine. I called him childish cause the nigga read and wrote his review out of spite, stupid cause after deleting the review he came back to the forum to pop up more people and even said he will write another review over and over again. I saw those who even supported him and I'm like ..men, baby girl, this people ain't thinking from there head but thy eir arsecheek.
- Edited
StenDuring Yo, all this is your business, I've said mine but I'm gonna add a little stuff. I said writing: stupid author is wrong, blah blah. This is a very stupid review, well some nigga still gonna argue on this matter, now that shit is your time, your business. I don't give a damn but all you yo writing unnecessary or stupid reviews. Go watch a porn online and after leave a review: stupid movie, the FL slept with three men or they fuckin forced her or the most stupid one, they were fucking naked!. Now people do this shit but it's called stupidity, accept it if you're stupid, you're stupid and don't carry your stupidness to an author review section or any thing review section. Some dumb asshit you niggas be doing and still yet you see some cool niggas supporting it.
Gem4Life yeah that doesn't even add up.... Girl seriously, your body responded and thats it...really girl, really.
Clowniac Dont be that guy (because they are always guys).
I can't
I come back randomly and just think, srsly?
Anyways, all you guys have said your piece, so let's just drop it. I'm sure the people that come by here and don't post have a feeling as to who's right, so no need to add on to anything.
Halona this is the only time I'm gonna address you cause from your replies I can tell you are very childish and immature. I am not the author of any book, the author in question did come on and attack everyone. Even though no one becides me was talking about her book
Most were trying to see both sides (you would have known that if you had read the actual posts), If the author had come and attacked me only then there would not have been such a big issue. As you have a right to post a reply, I also have a right to air out my grievances when I feel I was wronged.
Also, I don't know if you're black (I am) and I don't care, but please stop using the N word in your posts, cause I find it very offensive and I WILL report you.
- Edited
Gem4Life Yo you're childish and immature. You fucking started this thread and the author only posted cause this thread is talking some shit about her/his book, now I ain't got no time to chat with a little nigga who got no brains but I'm gonna do that. U said u gonna report my account, yo I don't fucking give a fuck and this right here proves how childish you are. I ain't saying this to only black niggas, I'm saying it to all niggas cause I'm both and I don't care if you're too. You got a lot of shit in your head and I ain't gonna put up with it. If I can't mend it, I'm gonna mess it up. After webnovel doesn't block my account, come to columbia, devin street 153 and ask for Halona, you don't fucking know me and there we gonna find out who the fuck is childish.
