So I write a novel and have a dilemma what kind of style I should chose. This apply mainly to manner of describing the world and explaining it to the audience. The first one is direct explanation given by the narrator to the reader as in this case
"And so they were quarreling all the way back to their city which took them a full day. It is worth to mention that the first way when they were delivering "The prey" had taken them almost a three days. The reason of that was quite obvious the girls were not eager to became a dinner. In result the men(by some people known also as watchdogs) used to disciplined their captives really harsh so when they finally were presented to the dragon they would not do anything what the beast could see as disrespect. As reader can noticed The Watchdogs were not cruel by their nature. They were really touched by the fate of the young women yet still they had no courage to oppose. This only show us how fierce and malicious Voland was that even man of kind-heart turn into emotionless servant."
The second one is using dialog as a narrative device as in this case
"-Hehe I see that you are quite curious person aren't you? That is true that steel is better in combat however bronze is more reactive to Power of The World. Effects of incantations hold on longer on bronze than on any other metal. This is also the reason why the previous age is called The Age of Heros. Back then bronze was the mani material used to make weapon and armors so they rely more on Power of The World than we do today."
The first approach seems to be more creative but some people may find it weird and abandon the novel.
The second approach seems to to be safer but it is less probable that it would attract someone via originality.
The best choice seems to be used both of them depending on what is more suited to the situation but then again people may found it as inconsistency of the author's style. It is hard to judge it myself so I would appreciate your opinion.