MasterRabbink I feel like that is way too harsh. After all, we don't get paid here and like Lord_HaarT said the author might not get anything in terms of reader feedback (despite whatever webnovel might do about it). What if an unpopular novel is dropped? (And who decides if an ending is an ending, btw? It might just be an open end for the author that the readers don't accept as an ending.) And what if there are circumstances the author couldn't even influence?
Banning someone because of that for a lifetime (If I understood you correctly) is way too harsh, imho.
Let's imagine the following:
Someone has been a good author all the time. He or she updated every or every other day and the readers were happy. Now, that author might get into an accident (or starts going on a cruise if you don't want a gruesome example) and is unable (because of his grave injuries or because there's no wifi on the ship) to post updates.
Now, if we take your guidelines then after a month, his novel would count as dropped (both a stay in the hospital or a cruise could take that long) and the author would be banned from inkstone. He returns after a month and ... Oh. Now he can't do anything. He's just banned.
Alright, so, looking at it a bit more closely, he could have told people beforehand that he's going on a cruise. The question would be: How would the yellow card be issued? Automatically? Or would there be some mod that goes around and checks? I doubt a mod would have that much time, so it's probably going to be the former. Now, the author could complain "I told them, so why am I banned?" - What do we do then? Maybe we'll unban him. We're nice people, after all. Then again, the same rights for everyone, his colleague in the hospital is banned, too, after all. So let's just ban them both.
Well, at least the author on the cruise could complain. The one in the hospital can't because, honestly, does he have to show his medical records to the readers or the mod that would be responsible? I certainly wouldn't want to do that if it was me. I mean, they're not my employer, there's my real name etc on it and that's not some data I'd like to give to some random people.
And here comes another problem then: I think we'd all agree that banning an author that was in the hospital because of some accident and couldn't update because of that (if it's bad he can't even make an announcement) would be really mean and shouldn't be done. But we can't force the guy to show his medical record. So, we can't actually check whether he was in the hospital or just plain lazy.
But then again, there can always be things that keep him from writing. Maybe there's some big thing going on in the company he's working at and he needs to work overtime for a few weeks and really can't gather the energy to write? If that was an author who only updated once a week (there are people like that), then it wouldn't be outrageous if he didn't update in a month. That would only be 4 chapters he didn't update, after all.
So, to cut the long story short (might be a bit late for that ) I feel like this needs to be seriously considered. The punishment is too harsh, imho, and we lack some guidelines to make sure it would be sensibly implemented.
We should, at least I think so, also keep in mind that at the end of the day the people writing here are doing this as a hobby and often have a job or other liabilities that might keep them from writing for a while.
At least, I think there shouldn't be a permanent ban. An author might just have struggled with one project and that so severely that he couldn't even write an ending. Or he just wanted to have it pending for a while and was sure he'd find a good way to continue later on. Considering he's the author, I feel like he should have the right to do so.