Why does GhostyZ manage to violate the rules of the webnovel freely and in an increasingly blatant way, including posting images with pornographic content on the cover of his fanfic?

Does the webnovel really not intend to do anything about GhostyZ by constantly posting fanfics until around chapter 40 (ignoring the 30 patreon advertising chapters and asking for powerstones) and then making them exclusive to his patreon?

Besides simply being absurd for someone to post more chapters asking for powerstones than real content, it is obviously a crime to monetize fanfics.

To make matters worse recently he created a new fanfic in which the cover is clearly pornographic content and no matter how many times we denounce it, the webnovel seems to do nothing.

For the love of god, there are children on this site and so we have a fanfiction at the top of the ranking in which the cover appears a porn image of Artoria from Fate / grand order.

Fanfic link: https://www.webnovel.com/book/endless-path-infinite-conquering_19771092206338505

    Also, you're not supposed to be allowed to ask for Patreon donations for a fanfic. Making money off fanfiction is illegal.

      Tomoyuki You are not allowed to sell or market any copyrighted materials. Patreon is neither of these so it's perfectly fine. What they are subscribing to is the author and not the product, incentive is irrelevant.

      It is the same way free translators could accept donations and offer bonus chapters etc, but could not sell or paywall the material itself without a license.

        Wolfick I don't know, but I'm looking at the Terms of Use on Patreon, which can be located here.

        Specifically under the All About Being a Creator section:

        Restrictions

        We don’t allow creations and benefits that violate our policies. You can learn more by visiting our Community Guidelines and Benefit Guidelines. A summary of those rules is that we don’t allow:
        Illegal creations or benefits.
        Creations or benefits that are abusive towards other people.
        Creations or benefits that use others' intellectual property, unless you have written permission to use it, or your use is protected by fair use.
        Creations or benefits with real people engaging in sexual acts.
        Benefits that involve raffles or prizes based on chance.

        And also under Your Creations section:

        To summarize: You keep complete ownership of all creations, but you give us permission to use them on Patreon. Make sure you have permission to use creations that you offer on Patreon.
        You keep full ownership of all creations that you offer on Patreon, but we need licenses from you to operate Patreon effectively.

        By posting creations on Patreon you grant us a royalty-free, perpetual, irrevocable, non-exclusive, sublicensable, worldwide license to use, reproduce, distribute, perform, publicly display or prepare derivative works of your creation. The purpose of this license is strictly limited to allow us to provide and promote memberships to your patrons. We will never try to steal your creations or use them in an exploitative way.

        You may not post creations that infringe others' intellectual property or proprietary rights.

        Patrons may not use creations posted by creators in any way not authorized by the creator.

          Tomoyuki I suggest you read that closer yourself.

          Creations or benefits that use others' intellectual property, unless you have written permission to use it, or your use is protected by fair use.

          This is specifically to prevent a person simply copying someone else's work then creating a patreon page around it.

          You can read more on it here:

          https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Legal_issues_with_fan_fiction

          Fan writers who argue that their work is legal through the fair use doctrine use specific fair use arguments in the context of fan works, such as:
          Fan works do not deprive the owner of the source material of income
          Fan works may work as free advertisement and promotion of the original source material
          Fan works are usually non-profit.
          Fan works do not copy, or attempt to substitute for, the original work.

          Fair use is not black and white, and is decided on a case by case basis when an issue crops up. As things stand at the moment, fanfiction is considered fair use and it is indeed transformative (as long as you aren't selling the product itself obviously)

          This is why you are allowed to write fanfiction and post it anywhere in the first place (as long it that does not infringe on the local rules and guidelines of where you are posting it)

          Tomoyuki To summarize: You keep complete ownership of all creations, but you give us permission to use them on Patreon. Make sure you have permission to use creations that you offer on Patreon.

          A fanfiction writer does not own the characters/setting/world etc... but they do own original content included within it as well as that particular piece of writing. Stealing someone's fanfiction is still considered theft, after all.

          They are also stating that you are giving them permission to distribute the content you are uploading (this kind of thing has been around for a long time now, and it is essentially just legal toilet paper to wipe their a.ss with in case there are issues later)

          Tomoyuki You may not post creations that infringe others' intellectual property or proprietary rights.

          Patrons may not use creations posted by creators in any way not authorized by the creator.

          This is the same as before, and is patreon specifically stating they do not accept piracy in any way, and doing so will get your account warned or directly banned.

          It is the same reason why Webnovel can't simply take the unlicenced translations of Qidian's books. The translator doesn't have legal grounds to translate and especially sell that translation, nor do they own the book, but they do in essence own "this particular translation".

            Sythcake Not to the content. You are subscribing to the creator's services, not the product itself. These are two separate things.

            You can charge an entry fee to a venue and still offer free drinks inside.

            Edit: If they placed an individual price on posts themselves you had to purchase to unlock, then it would be considered a paywall on the product and no longer under the protection of fair use due to profiteering. It would still need a copyright claim to determine fair use, but I am certain it would basically be instantly approved as copyright infringement and not fair use.

              Wolfick I suggest you read what you posted closer yourself.

              Wolfick Fan works do not deprive the owner of the source material of income
              Fan works may work as free advertisement and promotion of the original source material
              Fan works are usually non-profit.

              The moment you start accepting "donations" for your fanfiction, it is no longer "free" and "non-profit". Especially when you lock chapters behind paywalls on Patreon (and yes, fanfiction writers like GhostyZ do that, which is why you have these complaints in the first place).

              Wolfick If they placed an individual price on posts themselves you had to purchase to unlock, then it would be considered a paywall on the product and no longer under the protection of fair use due to profiteering.

              That is exactly what is happening, my friend. Basically writers like GhostyZ lock their chapters behind individual posts that can only be unlocked if you pay, similar to how Webnovel locks individual chapters. In fact, the Webnovel system (premium chapters and Privilege) is heavily borrowed from Patreon in the first place. Privilege, just like Patreon, caters to several tiers of donors/consumers, who get more bonuses the more they pay/donate.

              Just look at his Patreon page, for example. If you want to read anything, anything at all, you need to subscribe for a monthly fee to unlock his posts. And apparently he only promises to do a mass release if you pay him x amount of dollars. I don't know how to differentiate "creator's services" from "the product itself" in this case, because you are literally paying to read his product (which are the chapters). Are the written chapters not the product you pay for?

              This is completely different from say, if I were to already have a bunch of chapters posted and accessible online for free, and you decide to donate to me because you think I deserve a treat for what I did (maybe you tell me to go buy myself a cup of coffee). I'm not offering a product for sale in this case, but you think I deserve a treat in exchange for providing you some entertainment, and you're trying to encourage me to write new chapters in future (which is different from me withholding existing chapters behind a paywall).

                Wolfick Although your lawyering is on point, this sort of sophistry wouldn’t fly in a court.)

                  Tomoyuki

                  Tomoyuki The moment you start accepting "donations" for your fanfiction, it is no longer "free" and "non-profit". Especially when you lock chapters behind paywalls on Patreon (and yes, fanfiction writers like GhostyZ do that, which is why you have these complaints in the first place).

                  First, and once again, services and products are two different things. As for selling the specific content, I already explained it with an example before. Specifically:

                  You can charge an entry fee to a venue and still offer free drinks inside.

                  Just because you charge an entry fee doesn't mean the drinks are no longer being offered free.

                  Tomoyuki which is why you have these complaints in the first place

                  So why are you complaining about something which is in no relation with yourself? Tbh, this is actually the first time I have seen someone complaining that posting fanfiction on patreon is copyright infringement.

                  The Webnovel system as a whole doesn't heavily borrow from Patreon, it is a direct inheritance from the Qidian system, which has been around far longer than Patreon. As for some specific commonalities such as paying to read ahead (Privilege), this is the like a person who made a chair complaining that someone else who also made a chair copied them.

                  Tomoyuki Basically writers like GhostyZ lock their chapters behind individual posts that can only be unlocked if you pay, similar to how Webnovel locks individual chapters

                  Are you talking about posting on Patreon, or another site which sells the product itself like webnovel does for it's chapters? They are two different things.

                  Patreon = Subscribing to a person and their services
                  Webnovel = Subscribing to a product

                  Don't get me wrong, for all intents and purposes this GhostyZ may be using otherwise contemptible means to try and get you to subscribe to them, but it is still subscribing to them as an individual (as long as it is through patreon).

                  This isn't to defend any particular person's honor or anything, but you can pay someone to write you a fanfiction, because you are purchasing their services rather than the product, and they are not in breach of copyright until they, or you, explicitly sell the content as a product.

                  There is a lot of gray area in fair use, and whether accepting donations is to be constituted as profiteering off a particular product, a claim by the IP holder must first be made. Then the individual must either defend under fair use and prove it to be so, while the IP holder does the opposite.

                  Just because your subjective opinion of "by accepting donations, it is no longer free" does not mean it is no longer fair use, and until such a claim is made by the IP holder, it will remain under fair use. (Again, until explicitly sold as a product)

                  P.S. I'm not being biased or simply just against you, as the argument that he is using it as a product, and by extension no longer under fair use, can indeed be made. But that is not for you or me to make a claim against nor determine the validity thereof. People do far more contemptible things to earn money than toeing the line of fair use,

                    Sythcake This is exactly how a fair use claim runs in court. It's very expensive, which is why most wouldn't do it and instead come to a private agreement (usually resulting in taking down the work), and very messy with a lot of supposition.

                    Also, I am obviously no lawyer.

                    As for sophistry and whether it counts as a person's services or a product, that is mainly what such a case would be used to determine. (Of course, the sophistry of providing equivalent examples wouldn't fly in court though, even though it is not technically fallacious/sophistry)

                      I wonder why the fact he's earning money on patreon became more important than the fact he's publishing something with the tags incest and rape on Webnovel, as if it was entertaining things to make other perverts as himself to turn their brains into sewage water as his brain obviously is.
                      I thought the vetting process served for something...but it seems it doesn't.
                      @WEBNOVEL_OFFICIAL it's reported already, what are you doing about it?

                        SrtaA There is nothing wrong with the tags, but the content and how it is done. I am all for creative freedom, but it should be within the rules of the platform obviously.

                        For all intents and purposes, a lot of novels have rape in them. One of the classic xianxia tropes is the forced rape cliche, in which "she's poisoned and the only way for me to save her is the have sx with her".

                        I am actually completely against this portrayal of it. My viewpoint is that if someone is including a rape theme in their book, it should not be... well, for lack of a better word, excused. It's a bit of gray area though.

                        I am also against explicit rape scenes involving themes of grief. I find them revolting, and if his book contains that, +1 to reports.

                        As for incest... well, I'm mostly indifferent. Porn has teased with these themes since day 1 (step sister, step mom, step dad etc...). Plenty of Japanese works don't even bother to pretend a fake blood relation. A lot of light novels also contain incest themes, and they are targeted towards teens/young adults.

                          Wolfick Just because you charge an entry fee doesn't mean the drinks are no longer being offered free.

                          You're not even supposed to be allowed to charge an entry fee for a venue you don't own in the first place. Reminds me of those bandits who try to extort money from you because you cross a road that they claim is their territory (but obviously it isn't). If you want to use that as an analogy, you have to take note that the original creator is basically the landlord, and fanfiction authors can't just go into a venue and charge entry fees for a property they don't own. It's illegal to begin with.

                          Wolfick So why are you complaining about something which is in no relation with yourself? Tbh, this is actually the first time I have seen someone complaining that posting fanfiction on patreon is copyright infringement.

                          GhostyZ has been notorious for doing this, this isn't the first time it has been brought up in the forums. It's like the third time in maybe three years. Also, I was simply addressing Sky_sorvering's complaints.

                          A quick search on the forum will give you these links: https://forum.webnovel.com/d/27674-ghostyz-the-harem-god-is-a-disgusting-author
                          https://forum.webnovel.com/d/27666-is-author-ghostyz-scamming-his-followers

                          Wolfick Patreon = Subscribing to a person and their services
                          Webnovel = Subscribing to a product

                          So if you post a chapter on Webnovel/Inkstone, it becomes a product, but somehow if you post it on Patreon it suddenly becomes a service and is subject to other rules? I'm not sure if that makes sense?

                          If I sell bottled water in Seven Eleven, it's a product, but just because I sell bottled water in a Church, that doesn't suddenly turn it into a service. People are still paying me for the water, and not for my services of carrying the bottles to the Church.

                          Wolfick This isn't to defend any particular person's honor or anything, but you can pay someone to write you a fanfiction, because you are purchasing their services rather than the product,

                          What exactly is the difference between paying for a fanfiction chapter and paying someone to write you a fanfiction chapter? Semantics aside, you get an identical product.

                          Wolfick and until such a claim is made by the IP holder

                          Honestly, the IP Holder (MF Bunko J or Dengeki Bunko in this case) wouldn't be bothered to sue him for English fanfiction. That said, you have Japanese companies suing fansubbers and shutting down their sites even though they are doing it for free (no donations), so they can do it. It's just that they most likely wouldn't bother because quite frankly, it's not worth the trouble.

                          But if they do, he's basically screwed. There is nothing he can say in his defense, no fair use, nothing.

                          SrtaA it's reported already, what are you doing about it?

                          Nobody is commenting on it because the story has already been removed. If you click on the link, it'll give you a dead link. So Webnovel has already done something about it.

                            Tomoyuki

                            Tomoyuki You're not even supposed to be allowed to charge an entry fee for a venue you don't own in the first place. Reminds me of those bandits who try to extort money from you because you cross a road that they claim is their territory (but obviously it isn't). If you want to use that as an analogy, you have to take note that the original creator is basically the landlord, and fanfiction authors can't just go into a venue and charge entry fees for a property they don't own. It's illegal to begin with.

                            I don't understand this at all. Patreon is the metaphorical venue, the posts on Patreon the free drinks, and the subscription the metaphorical entry fee. You are calling the IP holder the venue and fanfiction writers gatecrashers, which isn't making sense to me at all as I don't see the relation as to why the IP holder is a "venue".

                            Tomoyuki So if you post a chapter on Webnovel/Inkstone, it becomes a product, but somehow if you post it on Patreon it suddenly becomes a service and is subject to other rules? I'm not sure if that makes sense?

                            If you explicitly sell that chapter as a product, yes. If you sell your services in that "only my subscribers can see my creations" but aren't selling the chapters themselves, then no, you aren't selling a product.

                            https://corporatefinanceinstitute.com/resources/knowledge/other/products-and-services/#:~:text=What%20are%20Products%20and%20Services,of%20one%20or%20more%20individuals.&text=In%20fact%2C%20a%20majority%20of,them%20an%20element%20of%20service.

                            Perhaps I was misleading without intending to be. The chapters/posts are products regardless of where they are posted, but the model is different. On webnovel, you pay specifically in exchange for the product (i.e the chapters), on Patreon, you subscribe to the creator and their service of creating content, but not any specific product itself.

                            Tomoyuki What exactly is the difference between paying for a fanfiction chapter and paying someone to write you a fanfiction chapter? Semantics aside, you get an identical product.

                            Service and product is the difference. In one, you are purchasing the product, which in the case of fanfiction means you would no longer be in fair use. The other, you are purchasing the writer's service of writing something, which they are completely free to sell to you.

                            It's not just semantics. They are legally identified as two separate things.

                            Tomoyuki you have Japanese companies suing fansubbers and shutting down their sites even though they are doing it for free (no donations)

                            This is mostly done by english publishers, such as funimation, and yes it isn't worth the trouble. Also, fansubs aren't under fair use by the simple fact in that they are not transformative. This is the same with novel translations, and are a completely different category from fanfictions so you can't really compare apples and oranges.

                            Tomoyuki If I sell bottled water in Seven Eleven, it's a product, but just because I sell bottled water in a Church, that doesn't suddenly turn it into a service. People are still paying me for the water, and not for my services of carrying the bottles to the Church.

                            If you sell the bottle of water then you are selling a product. If you are giving them away for free in a church, even if you are accepting donations, you are not selling the product itself. Even if the church charged $2 for whoever to come inside and you were paid a small commission for your volunteer work, you still aren't selling bottles of water. Well, that's getting convoluted so let me provide another example:

                            There are a huge number of YouTubers who make a living off creating reaction videos, in which they react to clips of others/memes etc... They can do this, and make money off them, because they're protected under fair use. They can't sell the video itself, but they can be sponsored and/or generate ad revenue, they can also release these videos on patreon which has less restrictions than YouTube.

                            For those who step too far out from fair use, or aren't transformative enough, they can indeed be sued for copyright infringement, which has been done before multiple times. MxRplays is a prime example of this.

                            This however is not for us to determine.

                            Tomoyuki GhostyZ has been notorious for doing this, this isn't the first time it has been brought up in the forums. It's like the third time in maybe three years. Also, I was simply addressing Sky_sorvering's complaints.

                            And he may indeed be a contemptible person, I don't know. But that doesn't make fanfiction, nor posting it on patreon, no longer under fair use and direct copyright infringement. If it was, Patreon would have been shut down or forced to reject all "fair use" materials long ago.

                              Wolfick oh, okay. I'm not a lawyer, so I'll just concede here because I realize this is getting way over my head and you're most likely right. I won't claim that I'm totally convinced, but I think your arguments about Patreon's model being different makes sense, and I'm just confusing myself unnecessarily.

                              And I think your YouTuber example makes sense because I know of Starcraft 2 and Warhammer 40,000 content creators (Lowko, WinterSEO) who have Patreon pages for their gamer channels. I think they have it on Twitch too, apparently.

                                Wolfick Fair use is a super grey-area.

                                While I might be wrong here, if the product that you want to use under fair use cannot be wholesome (full) without the OG content, its not considered fair use at all. Just like watching a 30s viral vid (that's 30s long in total) to add commentary is an infringement (since one can watch the entire thing on your commentary channel rather than on the channel that owns the vid) it cannot be brought under fair use. There are several cases of this kind of claim being successfully pursued.

                                Now, let's look at the fanfictions.

                                But before doing so, let's take a look at the novels itself.

                                In my opinion, a novel in essence can be divided into 4 parts
                                - Plot - which is basically the storyline
                                - Characters - who are the driving point of the storyline
                                - Worldbuilding - which is the background for the characters to drive the storyline
                                - Glue - everything else that's added as decoration.

                                Fanfictions can start from using just worldbuilding, then there are those who take the characters as well.

                                Now, let's look at a certain group of authors (Btw, Tolkien was one of them). Some authors are not writers per se, but avid worldbuilders that write novels to share the worlds they created. To bring Tolkien to the example, its often jokingly said that he wrote LotR series just to flex the languages he created for it.

                                That means, if you were to write a basic fanfiction, one using ONLY worldbuilding, and wrote it from the novel created by a worldbuilder, then you would be taking the most important part of the novel for yourself (the background, the rules of the world, the nations, the predetermined beliefs and all) and writing a product on it.

                                And that's where the crux of the problem lies. ANy author can claim that they are worldbuilder, making any fanfiction illegal even with the Fair Use, due to the fact that in order to write a fanfiction, you need to infringe of the most important part of the greater whole of the novel.

                                To put it in yet another example, imagine a company wanting to create a phone. But since they can't or don't want to be bothered with the groundwork, they take the newest iPhone, gut its insides out, change the outer cover and release it as a new phone. While looks are important part of the iPhone (and are not replicated in the fake) the insides are still protected by the IP and patents, making what said company would attempt illegal.

                                That means, no matter what, all fanfictions can be treated as IP infringement. As long as they are free of charge, not an literal copy and all, no one will pay any mind to them (that is, if they do not result in loss for the IP owner). But the thing is...

                                Fck the service and product thing. When the push comes to shove, both fanfic writing as a product and writing a fanfic as a service are using foreign IP without the right to do so and are obtaining profits from it. It doesn't matter whether its a donation, fee, subscription or anything else. In the face of law, you are generating income basing on the copyright you do not own.

                                In short words, no matter what kind of fanfiction you write, as soon as the IP holder of the OG content learns about it, they are free to sue you and take ALL the income you EVER earned from the fanfiction + penalty fee + judicial costs + judged amount. Because it was all generated with their IP as a foundation.

                                And it doesn't matter how much of it will you use.

                                Just like a company cannot suddenly come up with IphoneYay series and start selling it to the public while pretending to be a branch of apple, you can't benefit in any way or form from someone else IP. Because the income you create isn't sourced from your skills and efforts alone. You do not need to promote the fanfic, you do not need to promote the brand. You just take the existing fanbase that someone had to cultivate first, and attempt to leech on it for your own benefit.

                                Ah, whenever I used 'you' I didn't mean You particularly, but the person writing fanfic. Take it as my style of writing .

                                  Tomoyuki good, and thanks for let me know 🙂. Because 8 hours earlier when I reported too, it was still up.
                                  Thrice_Reckless_0 normalizing rape and incest as source of entertainment? Just because Japan doesn't care, shouldn't we? Uh, it feels like another tiresome discussion that won't take us anywhere.

                                    MotivatedSloth It is indeed super gray area. This is because whether a particular product is considered under fair use is often highly subjective and using non quantifiable metrics, such as "how transformative" it is.

                                    MotivatedSloth But before doing so, let's take a look at the novels itself.

                                    In my opinion, a novel in essence can be divided into 4 parts
                                    - Plot - which is basically the storyline
                                    - Characters - who are the driving point of the storyline
                                    - Worldbuilding - which is the background for the characters to drive the storyline
                                    - Glue - everything else that's added as decoration.

                                    More or less, yes. But this is non quantifiable and will entirely come under that basis of whether something is considered to be "transformative enough" to be protected under fair use.

                                    Of course, this would have to be debated on a work by work basis. Otherwise, it would be like Tolkien suing everyone who mirrored his image of what a fantasy elf is. (I believe I have read he defined the modern fantasy elf, but I could be mistaken)

                                    MotivatedSloth if the product that you want to use under fair use cannot be wholesome (full) without the OG content, its not considered fair use at all. Just like watching a 30s viral vid (that's 30s long in total) to add commentary is an infringement (since one can watch the entire thing on your commentary channel rather than on the channel that owns the vid) it cannot be brought under fair use

                                    As long as it is done under the conditions of fair use, such as critique and/or changing it's purpose enough, it can. Of course, like you've already mentioned, it's very gray, and for a reason too. You can't post a 90 minute "critique" of a movie for obvious reasons.

                                    MotivatedSloth There are several cases of this kind of claim being successfully pursued.

                                    Correct, but this is mostly because they were deemed not transformative enough.

                                    MotivatedSloth Fck the service and product thing. When the push comes to shove, both fanfic writing as a product and writing a fanfic as a service are using foreign IP without the right to do so and are obtaining profits from it. It doesn't matter whether its a donation, fee, subscription or anything else. In the face of law, you are generating income basing on the copyright you do not own.

                                    This is precisely what fair use is to protect against. Imagine if every movie production company sued any critique against their movie because it contained clips/information on its plot. They have technically used the foreign IP to create their product after all, which may be available to subscribers only etc...

                                    MotivatedSloth Just like a company cannot suddenly come up with IphoneYay series and start selling it to the public while pretending to be a branch of apple

                                    Obviously not, but they can create Napple and have a very similar product. The world is full of knockoff brands, many of which don't even try to be different (such as headache pills and stuff, panadol vs banadol... like, seriously?). Of course, there are fake goods too, but they are illegal.

                                    MotivatedSloth In short words, no matter what kind of fanfiction you write, as soon as the IP holder of the OG content learns about it, they are free to sue you and take ALL the income you EVER earned from the fanfiction + penalty fee + judicial costs + judged amount. Because it was all generated with their IP as a foundation.

                                    Basically all the IP holders know of the fanfictions. Damn, there are probably over a million Harry Potter ones alone (Edit: One of which was even 'canon-ized' by Rowling herself). As for costs, it's usually just a combination of penalty fee + projected damages to revenue + take down of work afaik. Depending on where you are getting sued, there may be paying the other side's legal fees or the American standard in which each side pays their own.

                                    I'm not entirely sure on what is the judged amount you are mentioning.

                                    MotivatedSloth Fck the service and product thing. When the push comes to shove, both fanfic writing as a product and writing a fanfic as a service are using foreign IP without the right to do so and are obtaining profits from it. It doesn't matter whether its a donation, fee, subscription or anything else. In the face of law, you are generating income basing on the copyright you do not own.

                                    Just going to give a broad response to this and the rest.

                                    Service and product, or service and goods, are two separate things legally. And until a claim is made against a particular work, or is explicitly in breach of copyright (which the host site can determine and act on), it is currently under fair use.

                                    The general consensus is that fanfiction falls under fair use, and the gigantic number of them out there on the internet is basically testament to that fact. Whether a specific work is being exploitative of the IP's product enough to mean they are no longer protect under fair use... it's case by case basis, and the claim by the IP needs to be laid first.

                                    Perhaps this may change in the future, but currently, all fanfiction is recognized as fair use.

                                    It's like Elvis or Trump impersonators. They are selling their services, not a specific product. A writer is fully entitled to sell their services to write regardless as to what they are writing, even if that is fanfiction. And that fanfiction is still protected under fair use because it is not being sold.

                                      Lol. So, this post thread went from boobs to tl;dr legals kind of quickly. :laughing:

                                      Damn! I didn't get to see the BOOBS cause the link goes to a "Whoops!" page.

                                      At the end of the day everyone is entitled to their opinion regardless of who is in the right or wrong. Not sure why some are acting so moralistic here, difference in opinion should be respected👌

                                        AriaKang True, everyone is entitled to their opinion but not all opinions are equal. Experts are experts for a reason. To say that someone's uneducated opinion about a subject can be held equal to someone else's who is able to defend and reflect on their stand point, is just a terrible misunderstanding of the value of opinions. Perhaps you're talking about subjective opinions that are based on personal preferences but that's not what the above conversation is about. Legal matters are an objective case and when we cannot just end it with let's respect each other's opinions.

                                        Honestly, I think the safest route is not to ask donations for fanfictions. I'm still not very clear on the legalities or Patreon, but better to be safe than sorry.

                                          Not GhostyZ the only one who does this. Believe me. He can do it because no one will really do anything even if he does it. You can check other novel writing sites and you will find a lot of novels like this with a patreon account linked to them. Only webnovel is strict about this. Wanna know why? They can't push a contract on you if your novel is a fanfic so they don't want you to set up a patreon either.

                                            FanFan They don't care about fanfics and them using patreon. It's about originals. They don't want authors to use Patreon instead of signing a contract with them because this means they will earn no money from your novel. Nor do they like when an author is encouraged to use patreon instead for the same reason.

                                            If a fanfic uses patreon, they honestly and probably couldn't care less because it is no threat to their potential income.

                                            Edit: The problem people appear to have with GhostyZ is not the use of Patreon specifically, but the underhanded scam like tactics he employs to get people to subscribe to him. But no matter how contemptible that may be, it technically isn't against the rules. Content itself can be brought into question, but there are no rules against his Patreon "scam" as far as I know.

                                              I consulted my friend, who is a lawyer, and this is what he has to say:

                                              Well, technically, it's against the rules because they don't own the copyright to the story or the characters, so them seeking compensation would be a breach in legality. Now, does this actually stop people? No. However, you can argue that you are paying for the services of the writer, hence their writing. So they can argue that they aren't profiting off the intellectual property of another person. It's a weak argument, but it exists.

                                              However, you can't demand s. You can't force anyone to pay for anything.

                                              As a matter of definition, a donation is a "gift." That would be the main argument here. Is a donation a gift or a compensation when it pertains to payment of such funds for a service? Are you merely donating them, or are you paying them to provide said service? I (as a lawyer) would say, if ALL of their work is locked behind a paywall, and it's like, "here is one free chapter, if you want to read anymore, you must pay or subscribe" then I would say you are compensating them, not donating to them.

                                              Some will use the service argument, but a smart attorney will argue the service they are providing is the providing of literature inspired by and based on the intellectual property of another.

                                              Of course, the IP owner has to sue the guy in the first place, which is unlikely to happen, but my lawyer friend pretty much confirms that what he is doing is technically illegal. Just because he gets away with it or the IP owner couldn't be bothered to sue him doesn't make it legal.

                                              Now, if someone just post chapters on Patreon for free, people read them and donate to him/her on the page, there is still a lot of room to maneuver, simply because you are not demanding payment or forcing anyone to compensate you. If people donate to you when you didn't ask for it, it's a gift.

                                              This, however, changes completely when you start locking chapters behind paywalls like what GhostyZ did. Now he is actually demanding payment for providing chapters that are inspired by and based on the intellectual property of other people without seeking the original creators' permission. You literally have to pay $5 a month just to read any of the chapters...and $2 a months just to read "announcements" and update posts. If you don't subscribe, everything is locked to you. For now, nobody could be bothered to sue him because it's just not worth it. But if he starts making a substantial amount of money on Patreon or gain a significant following (maybe a few thousand donors), you can bet your a the IP owners (i.e. Dengeki Bunko or GA Bunko or Fujimi Fantasia Bunko or Shueisha or Kodansha) will come down hard on him. The problem is that, being Japanese, they wouldn't even know about English fanfiction until...yeah. You could, of course, report him to Yen Press or Viz Media or Kodansha USA, who own the rights to the English translations, but I don't think anyone is that malicious.

                                              Also, I don't think he will be sued. Most likely they (Yen Press/Viz Media/Kodansha USA) will first file a cease and desist order and request that he takes down his fanfiction. Patreon, being the host website, will most likely comply. So it's unlikely to go to court unless this guy has made a substantial profit from his donations.

                                                Tomoyuki You should speak with your lawyer friend again and ask him to look into closer detail on whether it is protected under fair use or not, which is what any such case would come down to. There are also surely plenty of older cases he can look into if he's really invested in it to determining the most likelyhood in whether it constitutes as fair use

                                                Most of it is whether his particular method of putting chapters behind a subscription service for only subscribers, and using that to produce incentive counts as enough in which it is no longer protected by fair use. As all fair use law cases would go, it is about this specific work and methods employed in its use.

                                                The moment that work is determined to no longer be under fair use, then everything changes and he is fully liable. Patreon would have to remove it as well. As for whether his work in particular is... I don't know. I personally don't think it is some great violation of fair use, but a legal case on his methods could easily go either way.

                                                For instance, the usual route a fanfic writer would go on patreon is that you can subscribe to support the author and/or read ahead. The product itself is not being exchanged in the transaction, which is where the sharp line of fair use is drawn.

                                                It is the same reason people can make a living off doing review videos on youtube, why they can stream gameplay on twitch (taking in donations and subscriptions), why artists can produce artwork of otherwise copyrighted characters etc...

                                                However, and also along the same lines of what your friend is pointing out, the overwhelming majority of this material is free to view elsewhere or on that platform in one form or another. It is whether GhostyZ's methods of subscribers only/subscribe to read, counts as enough to no longer be under fair use. Similar to your friend, I would think it wouldn't be in his favor, but it is still technically not my call to make. Until a claim is made, or the platform hosting it (Patreon) determines it to not be fair use under their policy, for all intents and purposes, it is still under fair use.

                                                Edit: But you are right in that it most likely will never go to court because there in nowhere near enough financial incentive to do so.

                                                Edit x2: After all, fair use is the legal protection to allow people to use otherwise copyrighted material. It must, however, be in accordance with fair use guidelines.

                                                Edit x3: It isn't black and white however. For instance, let's say I'm producing my own original content on patreon and incentivizing and putting it behind a figurative paywall. Of course, I own all rights to my work and am free to do so. Now, let's say I want to give back some more to my patreon subscribers, so I also start writing a fanfiction I was passionate about, and release it only for my subscribers.

                                                I am not leveraging this fanfiction in order to create incentive to subscribe to me, nor am I using it in an otherwise transactional manner. I am merely releasing it to a select group of people I want to show my appreciation towards.

                                                In this instance, despite it not being released freely to the public, I would still consider it under fair use.

                                                  Tomoyuki Also, I don't think he will be sued. Most likely they (Yen Press/Viz Media/Kodansha USA) will first file a cease and desist order and request that he takes down his fanfiction. Patreon, being the host website, will most likely comply. So it's unlikely to go to court unless this guy has made a substantial profit from his donations.

                                                  And/or a DMCA. Patreon have their own legal toilet paper to avoid any liability. But he would likely be given the opportunity to refute/defend his case at the very least. Should he not do so, Patreon would at a minimum deem it themselves as not under the guidelines of fair use and demand he remove this material or they will do so themselves (And he won't receive any money until he does so).

                                                    DMCA fair use
                                                    It reference four factors to measure fair use. They are:

                                                    1. the purpose and character of the use, including whether such use is of a commercial nature or is for nonprofit educational purposes;

                                                    2. the nature of the copyrighted work;

                                                    3. the amount and substantiality of the portion used in relation to the copyrighted work as a whole; and

                                                    4. the effect of the use upon the potential market for or value of the copyrighted work.

                                                    here is the link
                                                    https://www.dmca.com/faq/Fair-Use#:~:text=It%20allows%20the%20limited%20use,%2C%20research%2C%20teaching%20or%20scholarship.

                                                      TheWarriorWithin This is absolutely right. You need to know though that it is a combined evaluation of all the factors, and determined on a case by case basis. It's not if you toe the line too closely on one factor that it is automatically not fair use.

                                                      For instance, if it is used in an educational video or book, you can even sell it. *also case by case basis

                                                        Wolfick yes copyright is complex, when a person owns an IP he/she only has the right to make it into profitable product for certain period of time
                                                        for ex. YouTube videos, youtubers copy idea and content but still it comes under fair use because they added some value to the product.
                                                        its a different story that how much new value needed to be added for it to come under fair use. (for reaction channels if a original video is of 5 min then it is generally expected that minimum 5-8 min of new content should be added )

                                                          Wolfick You should speak with your lawyer friend again and ask him to look into closer detail on whether it is protected under fair use or not

                                                          It is not, unfortunately. You could try to argue otherwise, but fair use only applies when a work is nonprofit and the fanfiction is free. He explained to me that if you're locking fanfiction chapters behind a paywall, there is no wriggle room for you to claim "fair use." You could try to argue that it doesn't take away any income that would otherwise go to the original author, but the fact that you're still using characters or parts of a story whose copyright you do not own for commercial purposes takes away any fair use claim you might have. Clearly, fanfiction is not educational, and the fact that you lock chapters behind "donations" already render that claim unviable in any case. He said that the only argument you can make is that the paywall is for "writing services", which he has already debunked because your provision of fanfiction chapters are based on the intellectual property owned by others.

                                                          Keep in mind, we are talking about GhostyZ's specific case here, not yours. Your service might probably be considered fair use because I don't think you're actually offering fanfiction for money, and therefore it's not commercial or profit. And I'm not about to text my friend at 6am to ask him about your specific case. Also, GhostyZ writes R18 fanfiction, which is most certainly not educational, and he writes fanfiction on My Hero Academia, Attack on Titan, and I think Is it Wrong to pick up girls in a Dungeon? None of which are available on the public domain, and all of which you need to actually purchase to read. And I don't know how the copyright owners will react to R18 fanfiction being written about their work. They might laugh it off (since Doujins are a thing and these companies don't care about what's being sold in Comiket), or they might issue a cease and desist. But the American companies might not be as sanguine, especially when they learn he earns close to $1,000 a month. Better yet, I think income earned through Patreon is not taxable, so GhostyZ doesn't have to pay tax. So if light comes on how you have a bunch of full-time writers (GhostyZ actually declares that he wants to become a full-time writer this way, and with the amount of money he gets per month, it's not difficult for him to) making a living off non-taxable income on Patreon, I think the government might even step in eventually. Not that I intend to snitch on him...

                                                          Also, fair use comes to play if I release my fanfiction for free on my Patreon page, I don't lock them behind paywalls. But if people wish to donate to me, that's considered a gift, and therefore I am protected because my fanfiction is not commercial. It is nonprofit. In that specific case, I am protected. But the caveat is that I should never ask for "donations" in exchange for releasing fanfiction chapters or making available fanfiction chapters. Donors have to give them to me willingly on their own accord without me asking them for it directly. Unfortunately, my friend explains that the moment I start locking chapters behind a paywall or making these chapters available only to subscribers, I am essentially telling the readers that, yes, I am demanding payment for a chapter of an IP that I do not own, and that's a breach in legality.

                                                            Tomoyuki What he has explained is not "debunking" the argument. He is stating that is basically the main argument you could, and would, make. Also, it is not a very strong argument in this instance, particularly due to the nature of the case.

                                                            I agree with him on this, which is why I stated I believe a judicial decision on the matter would most likely not end in his(GhostyZ's) favor. My previous statements are on fanfiction as a whole, and the general method of patreon usage, which is just to read ahead of whatever the author is writing; early access. It's enough in the grey area I don't believe it is in violation of fair use. (A court could still rule against that, but it is yet to be seen afaik)

                                                            You are also right in that by using it for "commercial purposes", it is no longer fair use.

                                                            What I am saying is that the chapters themselves have not explicitly been exchanged in the transaction, so he hasn't actually crossed that sharp line where it is automatically deemed to no longer be under fair use (and it is indeed not educational in any way)

                                                            Because of this, it is not up to us to determine whether the product, his fanfiction, is being used commercially.

                                                            I am not even in disagreement with your viewpoint on his work and the nature pertaining to it, I just consider it from the perspective that we are not the jury to determine it as not under fair use. And that until a proper claim is made against it or the platform it is hosted on acts upon it, whilst it probably isn't under fair use, it is essentially treated as it is. This is just GhostyZ's work, not all fanfiction. Just to be clear. (You can definitely report it to patreon that you believe this content is not under the guidelines which constitute fair use due to how he is leveraging it, but they still need to decide and act on it at the very least)

                                                            As for taxable income. Ngl, I don't know a lot about taxation.

                                                            Technically, a "donation" by nature is non taxable. It also means people "donating" to authors can also claim it off their tax... Well, I don't believe the tax agency are going to chase down all these people earning money off Patreon, nor anybody claiming a $50 deduction from their tax.

                                                            How they proceed would be entirely up to their discretion, and rather than chasing all the ants around for potential tax evasion, they would go after the motherload, which would be Patreon itself. Of course, that would be an entirely different conversation by people more knowledgable on taxation. I don't believe Patreon's lawyers would leave them vulnerable to liability in such a blatant way though.

                                                            Tomoyuki But the caveat is that I should never ask for "donations" in exchange for releasing fanfiction chapters or making available fanfiction chapters

                                                            You're more than free to ask for donations, you just can't leverage of your fair use material in order to acquire them. Well, you can, but if the IP holder starts throwing salt rocks at you, you will most likely be in trouble haha.

                                                            As for author's being offended by R18 fanfiction. As you said, there are countless doujinshi out there. Many of these authors are degenerates themselves. I highly doubt the vast majority of them care. Actually, when the hololive girls got doujins made of them, they were excited. One of them even did reviews of material on herself

                                                            XDDDDD

                                                            Dear god that still makes me laugh.

                                                              Wolfick yeah, definitely. I was talking about GhostyZ in particular, not fanfiction in general.

                                                              Also, unless a significant portion of the population earn substantial income from Patreon, the government is unlikely to do anything about it because...quite frankly, it's time-consuming and just not worth it. So Patreon is definitely safe. If anything does happen, it'll be more of reformative measures, not a "take down patreon" or "sue Patreon content makers" thing, like changes in policies. Sort of like Facebook and info-gathering policies, I think. You don't sue the site, you implement changes. Right now, I don't think it's substantial enough, but if it does become a big enough thing, governments will start looking at it. Or maybe they won't, but given how major websites or social media such as Facebook, Youtube, etc. have become the subject of policy changes, I won't be surprised if they do.

                                                              How do I put it...if it becomes an issue, they'll just release an announcement telling everyone there will be policy changes and give the content creators time to change their content to suit the new policies. Not immediately suing people and banning them from posting content. I don't mean people will get into trouble, I just meant they will pressure Patreon to make policy changes.

                                                              Wolfick You're more than free to ask for donations, you just can't leverage of your fair use material in order to acquire them. Well, you can, but if the IP holder starts throwing salt rocks at you, you will most likely be in trouble haha.

                                                              That's what I meant, I mean, I can't tell my readers, "if you want to read the next chapter, you must subscribe to my Patreon for $5 a month." However, I can ask for donations on my Patreon page. You're right about that. Sorry for not being clear.

                                                                Tomoyuki

                                                                I was actually mistaken in that donation I mentioned. I was thinking of donation to charity, which can be a deduction. As for standard donation, from what I remember, by donating money, you are paying tax on that amount on your income, therefore the person you are sending it to does not have to pay tax on it (this avoids people paying tax twice on the same amount of money aka "this is money in which tax has already been paid on")

                                                                I remember this because I used to pay editors via donation, and I paid tax on that money so they didn't need to.

                                                                There may be other provisions on it and tax loopholes etc... but yeah, get a tax consultant friend for that haha

                                                                  Web Novel Novel Ask